頗受爭議的比試:Teac vs. Mytek vs. Benchmark vs. Palyback Design

HOHOHO · 發表於 2013-3-27 11:41

davidwutk 發表於 2013-3-6 14:04
不如係本土搞場鑑聽會,耳聽為實,應該唔少人都想以第一身黎感受下唔同DAC既味道.否則,可能好似CHING話齋,只 ...

不如係本土搞場鑑聽會,耳聽為實 agree x 1000 %

stupidguy · 發表於 2013-3-27 21:39

Good ideal！
Hope it come true.

ultraleo · 發表於 2013-3-28 01:14

lwhk 發表於 2013-3-7 15:43
".....At session’s end, someone called for a blind listening test. Half the people present said it ...

其實就好似日產GTR咁，佢嘅性能絶對係超級跑車；但喺好多車迷眼中佢始終只係一部日本車。點都唔及法拉利等超級跑車。就算真的不及法拉利等跑車，但比多一倍價錢係咪好一倍性能呢?大家都知道不可能。因為嗰一倍價錢喺用咗去買虛榮。但音響係用來聽的，應該啲錢用喺自己啱聽的器材上。當然當你好有景時就另計啦!但如果只比功能音色，而唔係比價錢、品牌嘅話。應該以個人聽感、口味行先。

rsx · 發表於 2013-3-29 01:20

kenneth_obee 發表於 2013-3-27 09:39
Like stock market, there're lot of players in hifi, some people play by eyes, some like blind test ...

i just want to say there should not be conflicts between people playing by eyes or blind test, if the report is true, it proved that people saying it is waste of time of doing blind test is wrong, isn't it?

and it is quite strange and funny that many hifi players try and pay EVERYTHING to make sound better, but reject to try bling test that is free.

obee · 發表於 2013-3-29 12:02

rsx 發表於 2013-3-29 01:20
i just want to say there should not be conflicts between people playing by eyes or blind test, if ...

blind test != open eye test != just read spec != personal preference

"!=" above means "not equivalent to"
ching, nothing is related at all, human (or the market, or the consumer or the hifi product producer) just tries to make them "equivalent", or believe they are.

I think that all the above are just open end.