聽 Lossless FLAC, WAV 同 CD 冇分別?

qwe456

因為我用SSD，所以都要慳住用FLAC
kc2wong 發表於 2011-8-24 18:14

    I only use the SSD as boot drive and I run all the programs of the SSD.  But everything else is stored over the network in chunkier traditional drives.

kc2wong

哈哈，剛剛睇緊ezone，原來我都係錯嘅，就算只係rip碟呢個stage，都做唔到100%準確

joelkw

哈哈，剛剛睇緊ezone，原來我都係錯嘅，就算只係rip碟呢個stage，都做唔到100%準確 ...
kc2wong 發表於 2011-8-24 18:36

其實邊有野保證100%準確無誤? 題外話:  正如人生就係因為充滿錯誤先精彩o麻!
各位ching唔好因為一d唔存在答案o既問題而傷和氣, 一笑置之啦.

qwe456

哈哈，剛剛睇緊ezone，原來我都係錯嘅，就算只係rip碟呢個stage，都做唔到100%準確 ...
kc2wong 發表於 2011-8-24 18:36

    One thing you have to remember: Compact Disc, as a technology, is 30+ years old.  Everything else has come a loooooooooooooong way since then, from the way music is recorded, etc.  But, the delivery mechanism hasn't changed much.  Why are we still at 16-bit/44.1kHz?  It's been a good 30+ years...

Big_McIn

作為一個消費者：

FLAC和WAV得來途徑，不在乎是：

1.  網上Download。

2. Ripping。

單看MB，Rip出來的Files內有MB與原來CD內存MB比較，容量可以一樣，這是一個「量」，亦是IT角度裏Lossless。

Red Book CD經Transport讀取，以16bit/44.1KHz輸出，FLAC/WAV經Music Server或CAS輸出，可upscale達192KHz，這亦是一個「量」。

HiFi角度，除了量外，最重要是質，從Download得來或rip出來的files，其本身質素，只可以在重播Analog音樂時方可知道，這是本文精要。

SACD在量方面是比Red Book CD 優勝，但在一套High End組合重播Analog music，SACD便得現在收場。

atsw10

哈哈，剛剛睇緊ezone，原來我都係錯嘅，就算只係rip碟呢個stage，都做唔到100%準確 ...
kc2wong 發表於 2011-8-24 18:36

我都啱啱睇到... 其實只可以講, Audio CD 係一個好鬼麻煩既 Media..

qwe456

我都啱啱睇到... 其實只可以講, Audio CD 係一個好鬼麻煩既 Media..
atsw10 發表於 2011-8-24 21:45

    What's on e-zone this week?  I couldn't pick up a copy on my way home today...

atsw10

回復 87# qwe456

Just saying when ripping Audio, a good disc reader and software is needed, because it really affect the quality of the ripped file. This point really against what I know before. What's a good and technical article! I learn more!

ANWKLO

哈哈, 又來啦, 人生百態

qwe456

回復  qwe456

Just saying when ripping Audio, a good disc reader and software is needed, because it ...
atsw10 發表於 2011-8-24 22:31

    Haven't read the article yet, but you can be super anal if you want to...  For example:
1. There's a service out there that allows you to compare the files you ripped vs. what others got, to determine the "quality" of the rip...  I keep forgetting what it's called though...
2. Build a minimalist PC just for ripping, don't install any unnecessary software, e.g. graphics drivers...  (no shxt, Sherlock)
3. House the drive outside of your PC: in a heavy external case with external power supply, connected through USB 3, Firewire, SATA, eSATA, or whatever way your fancy.  If you choose SATA/eSATA, separate the CD reader from the HDD chains (one off an independent chip, another off your Intel chipset).  If you opt for USB, use one of the connectors at the back of your mobo, instead of one of those on the front panel...  etc. etc. etc.
4. Use whatever software you fancy to calibrate the CD drive before ripping...  

Honestly, I think some of these are overkill...